rattlewind

Ice Cream

see my other blog, theworldspelledbackwards for my exposure of the great ice cream scandals.

Iceland Breaks Whale Hunting Ban

Iceland breaks the 21-year-old whale hunting ban

You can read the news article below. But my first point is that though one may think of Iceland as a frozen dot in the North Atlantic, the U.S. has a $2 billion trade with that dot. The official stance of the U.S. Dept. of Commerce is that Iceland made the wrong choice to break the whaling ban. Now the U.S. is backing off saying that the limits of the take will be small enough. But, since there is no other reason to kill these magnificent mammals (second largest whale) except to make steaks out of them, I would suggest that zero take would be about the right size. Since we have trade with Iceland, we should pressure them to stick to their aluminum and high tech industries and leave the whales alone.

The following is from the U.S. Embassy in Iceland:

Bilateral Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) activity is picking up rapidly, and within about five years, U.S. investment in Iceland will likely approach $2 billion, primarily in the aluminum industry.  Icelandic investment in the U.S. has also picked up of late, with major pharmaceutical, biomedical, and fish-related operations acquired by Icelandic firms.

Heres the story about Iceland's new whaling policy:

Iceland breaks 21-year-old whale hunting ban

Reykjavic argues that whales are plentiful in the North Atlantic

Updated: 2:26 a.m. PT Oct 22, 2006

OSLO, Norway - Icelandic whalers broke a 21-year-old international ban on whaling on Saturday when they harpooned the first fin whale since the moratorium was imposed in 1985, a whalers’ spokesman said.Fin whales are rated an endangered species on a “Red List” compiled by the World Conservation Union but Iceland says they are plentiful in the north Atlantic.

Reykjavik decided Tuesday to catch nine fin whales and 30 minke whales in the year to Aug. 31, 2007, despite the 1985 moratorium imposed by the International Whaling Commission.

Read the entire report at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15363210/

Read about the fight between finwhales and humans from a scientific point of view at http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/Fin_Whale

OUR IMPOTENT LEADERS

Oh, yeah. The news item below about an "Iraq Timetable" describes a possibly good way to build automobiles: using "milestones." Or testing medicines. Or investing in new enterprises. But in the context of Iraq it describes the desperation of total non-comprehension. "Well, we won't exactly say we're going to pick up our bats and balls and go home if you don't play by our rules, but maybe we will." Oh, yeah, that's a great road to clearing up the mess we made in Iraq. Does anyone hear about the "Roadplan" for peace between the Palestinians and Israelis any more? That was full of milestones and confidence building and hints of "sanctions." What an inheritance to pass on to future generations, a smoldering civil war in Iraq with PERMANENT, I SAY PERMANENT U.S. involvement there. (No the Democrats even if they have the presidency and both houses of congress won't have the will to get us out.) Unless....they do what we did in Vietnam and say, Okay, we lost, whoever the winner is, take over. Except...how much oil does Vietnam have? I think PERMANENT is the appropriate word. Which means for the future of America no increase of health care benefits, starving social security, and non-competitive education in our schools. Scary? This isn't a Haloween joke. Look how long it took England and France to finally admit that the colonialism had drained their economies and got out.

Well, read the following and understand the impotence of our leaders.

New York Times  October 22, 2006

U.S. to Hand Iraq a New Timetable on Security Role

By David S. Cloud

WASHINGTON, Oct. 21 — The Bush administration is drafting a timetable for the Iraqi government to address sectarian divisions and assume a larger role in securing the country, senior American officials said.

Details of the blueprint, which is to be presented to Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki before the end of the year and would be carried out over the next year and beyond, are still being devised. But the officials said that for the first time Iraq was likely to be asked to agree to a schedule of specific milestones, like disarming sectarian militias, and to a broad set of other political, economic and military benchmarks intended to stabilize the country.

Although the plan would not threaten Mr. Maliki with a withdrawal of American troops, several officials said the Bush administration would consider changes in military strategy and other penalties if Iraq balked at adopting it or failed to meet critical benchmarks within it.

A senior Pentagon official involved in drafting the blueprint said Iraqi officials were being consulted as the plan evolved and would be invited to sign off on the milestones before the end of the year. But he added, “If the Iraqis fail to come back to us on this, we would have to conduct a reassessment” of the American strategy in Iraq.

You can find the entire article, at least for a couple of days if you click here.

Take the veil, Mr. Straw

I have just come across the following info in an Associated Press article

[Comments] by Jack Straw, a former foreign secretary who now is leader of the House of Commons, [have] plunged Britain into a debate over Islamic integration.

Straw said in a newspaper column published Thursday that he believes the veils favored by some Muslim women inhibit communication and are a sign of division in society. At his constituency office, Straw said he asks that veiled women reveal their faces, adding that the women have always complied, and a female assistant is always present.

On Friday, British media quoted Straw as going further, saying that he would prefer that Muslim women not wear veils at all. "I just find it uncomfortable if I'm trying to have a conversation with someone whose face I can't see," Straw told the BBC.

I am not at all a fan of religious rituals, but neither am I a fan of western male arrogance. Straw is not arguing that the women are forced to wear veils against their will (he says "favored by some Muslim women"). He is arguing that they should defer to his taste for seeing the faces of the people he is talking to. But, in fact, they are visiting him as his constituents in his district office. He is the one who should be deferential to them (or is that too much of an American idea of representatives being the servants of the people). Why can he not look into the women's eyes and speak to them? Perhaps it is too important to him as a politician and manipulator of people to see how they respond to his words (and the theater of his body and facial language). Is he worried their lips are curling up in a snicker or down in disappointment that his political language is fluffy and misleading? This little vignette of Mr. Straw's displeasure wonderfully exposes the byplay in political language: that it is not the content of what is being said but rather the reading of people's emotional responses for clues to appropriate theatrical tricks that is important to a politician. That there are so many books teaching us to "read" people suggests that today content is less important than the subtleties of non-verbal persauasion.

I suggest that politicians (male as well as female) don veils so that we are more likely to pay attention to the content of their words rather than their toothy smiles and the false sincerity got up by square jaws and paternal wrinkles more likely acquired at late night cocktail parties than sleeplessness over the wars, poverty and environmental destruction for which they are responsible.

Da Bomb

Now that North Korea has exploded even a spindly nuclear bomb one sees a glimpse of a scary future where every little, fearful country wastes its lunch money on such paranoid fireworks. One glimpses the future too in the effect of science to make the at first difficult technologies as easy and common as hamburgers. Down the road we are coming to quantum and robotic technologies, immensely difficult now but eventually to be made easy and routine. Monstrous super computers will track populations and robots will do the work of killing, like a beastly terra cotta army. If N. Korea can starve its people to leap its rulers into the 21st century, then Pakistan (which already has the bomb) is primed to go forward to more horrible things using its opium money, and so with all the gang-run nations of the world. What's to prevent the drug lords of Colombia from getting the bomb for a menace to guarantee their capitalistic independence--or robot planes to deliver their products?

There are three great forces of terror in the world today: greed (as always), religion (as always) and technology (the relative newcomer). Clearly, the only good force in the world today is the will to survive and the evidence (to which most are blind) that survival of the self depends on the survival of the other. What an interesting horse race: to see if the human survival instinct will outperform the above three horses of the apocalypse. I think someone should try his or her hand at some speculative fiction: writing up some putative newspapers from the future--say a hundred years from now. Even if it were fiction, it would give an interesting perspective of someone looking back on the pot about to boil over and what happened to it.

Another excellent comment on this topic can be found at:

http://www.dailyawesome.com/2006/10/oh_crap

PEACE?

Friday the Thirteenth of this month the Nobel Peace Prize will be announced. Do I believe in omens? No. Well, a little. Enough to make me squeamish about this date. But then again, what is the outlook for peace, anyway. On the one hand, the peace thermometer seems to be rising (a good sign) in Uganda and Sudan (but not Darfur) but it's frozen since the nuclear test in N. Korea. To mix my metaphor, you push war down in one place and it pops up in another.

The headline that struck me today was "US unwilling to ban guns despite plague of school shootings" (AFP Press service). Perhaps we could re-word that to read "World unwilling to ban guns despite plague of everywhere shootings." What a dream, banning guns worldwide....

More blogs about rattlewind.